The one tale with real research behind it — and the number that shows why it still cannot tell you anything.
Of all the old wives' tales about pregnancy, this is the only one with real research behind it. That makes it the most interesting of the lot — and the easiest to overstate. The short version: there is a genuine, repeatedly measured association between severe sickness and carrying a girl, and it is far too small to tell you anything about your pregnancy.
Severe morning sickness means a girl. Mild or no sickness means a boy. Midwives have repeated it for generations, and unlike the belly-shape rule or the ring test, they were onto something.
Start with scale. Nausea and vomiting affects somewhere between 50 and 80 per cent of pregnancies. Hyperemesis gravidarum — the severe form involving persistent vomiting, weight loss and dehydration, often requiring hospital admission — affects somewhere between 0.3 and 3.6 per cent. These are very different things, and the research treats them differently.
Multiple studies have found a raised ratio of female to male fetuses among women admitted to hospital with hyperemesis. It has been observed often enough, across enough separate datasets, to be taken seriously. The proposed mechanism involves hCG — the hormone that drives early pregnancy nausea, which peaks around week 9 — together with differences in how placentas function depending on fetal sex.
It is worth saying that the finding is not unanimous. At least one study set out specifically to verify the association and found none. The overall weight of evidence points one way, but not without dissent.
This is the number that matters most, and it is the one nobody quotes. A study of 2,543 mothers covering 4,320 pregnancies asked women to rate their nausea on a scale of one to nine.
Carrying a girl: average 6.35
Carrying a boy: average 6.04
The difference was statistically significant. It is also 0.31 of a point on a nine-point scale. The two groups overlap almost entirely. If you handed someone a nausea score and asked them to guess the sex, they would be barely better than guessing.
That gap is the whole tale, measured. It is real, and it is nearly useless.
True in aggregate, useless individually. Across hundreds of thousands of pregnancies, the girls are associated with slightly more sickness. Within your pregnancy, the sickness you have tells you essentially nothing — the ranges overlap far too much.
This is what most real health findings look like: a small shift in a population that says almost nothing about any one person in it.
Something more useful, as it happens. Women with nausea and vomiting in pregnancy have been found to have a substantially reduced risk of miscarriage — supporting the idea that nausea is a sign of a well-functioning placenta.
That is a genuinely reassuring thing to know at 4am over a toilet bowl, and it is a far better reason to pay attention to morning sickness than guessing at the sex.
Hyperemesis is not a bad case of morning sickness — it is a distinct condition, and it is one of the more common reasons for hospital admission during pregnancy. Signs it has crossed that line include being unable to keep fluids down, weight loss, and passing very little urine or urine that is dark.
If any of that sounds familiar, that is a conversation for your midwife or GP today, not a question for a folklore quiz. It is treatable, and treating it matters.
See how this tale scores against 107 others →